Archived Posts from this Category
Archived Posts from this Category
Posted by karlmeyer on 08 May 2015 | Tagged as: 5-year FERC licensing process, American shad, Atlantic salmon, blueback herring, Connecticut River, Connecticut River ecosystem, Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon, Dr. Boyd Kynard, endangerd shortnose sturgeon, Endangered Species Act, ESA, Extinction, Federal Conte Anadromous Fish Research Center, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, federal trust fish, federally-endangered shortnose sturgeon, FERC, GDF-Suez FirstLight, MA Division of Fish and Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries Service, Rock Dam, Rutland Herald, shortnose sturgeon, The Greenfield Recorder, University of Massachusetts, US Fish & Wildlife Service, Vermont Digger
NOTE: the photo above documents conditions found at the Rock Dam Pool on the Connecticut River on May 3, 2015. Seventeen years of published studies conducted by federal and University of Massachusetts fisheries researchers at the adjacent Conte Anadromous Fish Research Center show that these river conditions cause spawning failure for federally-endangered Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon at the Rock Dam Pool, their only documented natural spawning site. The May 3rd river conditions found at Rock Dam mimicked mid-summer flows on the Connecticut–conditions that research shows drives spawning-ready females from the site, and de-waters the cobble-strewn pool where eggs and embryos attach and develop. April 25 to May 22 is the documented spawning window for the shortnose sturgeon on the Connecticut. It is a crime to kill, injure or interfere with endangered Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon under federal and state law. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the National Marine Fisheries Service, the US Fish & Wildlife Service, and the MA Division of Fisheries & Wildlife are responsible for the protection of the Connecticut River’s only federally-endangered fish under the Endangered Species Act(ESA). GDF-Suez FirstLight controls river flows to this site via spill gate operations at the Turners Falls Dam, just upstream.
A RIVER PRESERVED IN PLASTIC Copyright Â© 2015 by Karl Meyer
(The following essay–with minor variation in each, appeared recently in The Recorder, The Rutland Herald, and at Vtdigger.org)
A lifeless, three-foot long Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon sits on display at the Great Falls Discovery Center in Turners Falls, MA. The shortnose has been this riverâ€™s only federally-endangered fish since 1967. That plastic sturgeon has sat amidst other replica fish for a dozen years nowâ€”a plastic American shad, a blueback herring, a trophy-size Atlantic salmon. Theyâ€™re framed beneath a slightly-ruffled acrylic surface representing the Connecticut River at this flagship site of the Silvio Conte National Fish & Wildlife Refuge.
That display is the basic message offered to visitors here: â€˜This is a river with congenial flows supporting populations of shad and herring, big native salmon, and federally-protected sturgeon.â€™
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Few upstream migrants reach Vermont and New Hampshire today. Thatâ€™s part of the legacy of failure of federal and state fish agencies and watchdog groups claiming to safeguard an ecosystem and its native migratory fish. That legacy will remain intact until they confront ongoing conditions in Massachusetts that have been crippling the river here for decades.
That Discovery Center depiction falls apart if visitors simply walk outside onto the deck of the Turners Falls Bridge, adjacent to Turners Falls Dam. There, often for months on end, what theyâ€™ll see is the hollowed-out heart of New Englandâ€™s Great River–a waterless chasm, or one teased by just a trickle from the power companyâ€™s dam. Conversely, when rain or snow send more river downstream than can be profitably sent through FirstLightâ€™s power canal or stored upstream for their Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Station, those spill gates open wide–producing violent, see-sawing flows few fish can fight or follow.
Meanwhile a 200 million year-old evolutionary gem, the Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon, remains all but abandoned just downstream–teetering on the verge of extinction for decades. Likewise, American shad canâ€™t move upstream in the river here at all. Theyâ€™re forced into that turbine-lined power canal where less than 1-in-10 will emerge alive beyond the dam. And those blueback herring–protected on paper as a â€œfederal trustâ€ species, have not been counted here in almost a decade. Just 20 years back they passed by the thousands.
That plastic salmon, showcased for decades as the darling of this riverâ€™s fisheries restoration, has been extinct here since 1809. It should not be presented as a living native fish. In science, extinct isnâ€™t subject to interpretation.
That trophy-sized model derives from a massive hybrid hatchery program created by cross-breeding salmon imported from Canadian and northern New England rivers. For 43 years federal and state fish farms produced the millions of tiny fry dumped into the river each spring. Those fish factories repeatedly proved vectors for the potential spread of disease throughout the river system. Though those tiny fish proved great for public relations, no spawning population of engineered salmon ever took hold.
Hybrid salmon became the red herring that masked the massively broken ecosystem that exists on an eight-mile stretch of New Englandâ€™s Great River from the Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Station to the tailrace of the Turners Falls Power Canal. Those salmon were the stand-ins for agencies including the National Marine Fisheries Service, the USFWS, and MA Division of Fish & Wildlife that had failed to protect living migratory species here–and an ecosystem suffocating right in their backyard.
The plight of the only state- and federally endangered fish here represents the ultimate failure of responsibilities. Dr. Boyd Kynard spent decades studying the shortnose and documented itâ€™s only natural spawning site–the Rock Dam Pool, less than two miles downstream of Turners Falls Dam. Dam operations there were annually creating conditions that crippled spawning success for the remaining 300 sturgeon still able to reach their ancient rendezvous site.
Kynardâ€™s federal- and state-funded findings were given to fish agencies a decade back. Each bore legal responsibility for that sturgeon. Yet no agency or non-profit stepped-in to monitor and enforce Endangered Species Act protections. None intervened to halt the trickle-and-torrent flows preventing reproduction. That step alone wouldâ€™ve put living waters back into the river here–aiding the shad and herring attempting to reach Vermont and New Hampshire. Likewise in 2012, when Kynard published a book on the shortnose–documenting its life history and the river conditions necessary for its recovery, again, no one went to court to protect this public legacy.
Had agencies and watchdog groups taken responsibility years back for protecting spawning sturgeon at that Rock Dam Pool below FirstLightâ€™s dam, native migratory fish and the river ecosystem would be in a far better place today. Instead, that work was left to become part of the current studies in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionâ€™s 5-year relicensing process for the Turners Falls and Northfield hydro sites, where Iâ€™m on the Fisheries and Aquatic Studies Team.
Sturgeon spawning is not monitored today. Itâ€™s unconscionable to have waited for a 40 year relicensing process to come around before broaching concerns for an endangered fish and broken ecosystem. Hopefully it wonâ€™t prove the difference between a living river, and one merely depicted in a museum model.
Greenfield, MA journalist Karl Meyer is participating in the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissionâ€™s relicensing process for the Northfield Mountain and Turners Falls hydro sites.
Comments Off on Spawning shortnose sturgeon denied flow at Rock Dam Pool
Posted by karlmeyer on 08 Jul 2014 | Tagged as: Atlantic salmon, Connecticut River, Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon, Dr. Boyd Kynard, ecosystem, Endangered Species Act, Extinction, federally-endangered shortnose sturgeon, MA Division of Fish and Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries Service, NMFS, NOAA, Rock Dam, Turners Falls, US Fish & Wildlife Service, USFWS
Click on the link above for: Part one of Local Bias interview between Karl Meyer and Dr. Boyd Kynard, produced by Drew Hutchison of Greenfield Community Television.
Watch an interview with fisheries biologist Dr. Boyd Kynard who has made a career of researching migratory fish behavior and fish passage at dams in large rivers across four continents. Kynard is the long-standing research expert on the federally-endangered Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon.
For 45 years federal and state fisheries agencies plowed $100s-of-millions into a program targeting â€œrestorationâ€ of a strain of Connecticut River salmon extinct since 1809. Failing to understand the concept of extinction, that project failed.
For those same 45 years agencies including NOAAâ€™s National Marine Fisheries Service, the US Fish & Wildlife Service, and Massachusetts and Connecticut fish and wildlife departments ignored, dismissed, and failed to provide the protections, outreach, and funding needed to rescue a native, four foot-long, living fossil: the federally-endangered Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon.
Listed among just 22 fish species in the original 1967 federal Endangered Species Act, these agencies–as well as regional non-profits, have failed to protect the 2-mile stretch of river decimated by industrial flows containing the only known natural spawning grounds of this pre- Dinosaur-Age fish: the pool below a natural rocky cleft in the river known as the Rock Dam, in Turners Falls, MA. Just 300 Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon can access the Rock Dam site today–where industrial flows cripple their spawning attempts, and endangered species protections are ignored.
Comments Off on THE CONNECTICUT RIVER SHORTNOSE STURGEON: A PLANNED EXTINCTION?
Posted by karlmeyer on 21 Apr 2013 | Tagged as: American shad, Atlantic salmon, blueback herring, Connecticut River, Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, Connecticut River ecosystem, Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon, Endangered Species Act, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, federal trust fish, federally-endangered shortnose sturgeon, MA Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, National Marine Fisheries Service, shortnose sturgeon, US Fish & Wildlife Service, USFWS
Copyright Â© 2013, by Karl Meyer
The following piece appeared earlier this April in the Rutland Herald, Vtdigger.org, The Recorder, Daily Hampshire Gazette, Shelburne Falls Independent, and on other sites.
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The Shortnose Sturgeon and Springâ€™s Teachable MomentÂ
Thereâ€™s a watershed opportunity for teachers investigating migratory fish this spring.Â Itâ€™s the final season classrooms will raise Atlantic salmon eggs from a massive federal hatchery program, dismantled after 46 years.Â Itâ€™s a chance to teach kids that â€œextinct,â€ in evolutionary biology terms, means exactly that: gone, forever.Â Itâ€™s a profoundly simple lesson, with ramifications that can be fully grasped in a week.Â Iâ€™m hoping teachers will put a living dinosaur of a fish in that salmonâ€™s placeâ€”one still here, though teetering on the edge of extinction these 46 years: the federally endangered Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon.Â As teachable as T. Rex, this marvelously adapted, 3-4 foot fish has survived for 100 million years.Â
On April 20, 1967, two federal agencies and four states signed the Cooperative Fisheries Restoration Compact for the Connecticut River.Â It specifically targeted American shad and blueback herring, plus salmon–extinct here since Darwinâ€™s birth in 1809. Within two years its emphasis had overwhelmingly veered to conjuring up a new salmon.Â Still, with a little help shad and herring populations blossomed.Â Combined runs reached 1,000,000 fish in the 1980s; then dropped precipitously.Â Bluebacks are now rare as henâ€™s teeth.Â
By 1975, what was then the Federal Power Commission had heard testimony that Long Island Sound had warmed to a point that might prevent cold-water salmon from entering rivers in its basin.Â The climate had changed.Â Still, in 1980 MA and US Fish and Wildlife Service officials insisted a series of salmon ladders be built, leading all migrants into a power canal at Turners Falls.Â It failed instantly; yet skewed logic continued.Â In 1983 Congress renamed the restoration The Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission.Â It continues today.Â
Those extinct salmon had only visited here–the southern tip of their range, for a few centuries.Â Importing eggs from Canada and Maine, the program proved futile, costing millions annually.Â It left the real problem for native shad, herring and endangered sturgeonâ€”a broken Connecticut River, quietly untended.Â Those species had returned here for thousands of years.Â Bony-plated sturgeon had been vacuuming-up freshwater mussels eons before the present valley took shape.Â
On March 11, 1967, the shortnose was listed as â€œendangeredâ€ in the original Endangered Species Preservation Act.Â No one knew how theyâ€™d survived, or how many remained.Â Shortnose were sometimes landed downstream of the 1849 Holyoke Dam; and a few were recorded upstream below Turners Falls.Â By 1980, researchers discovered embryos and larvae upstream–proof shortnose spawned somewhere below Turners Falls.
Beginning in 1990, Dr. Boyd Kynard and colleagues began 17 years of continuous federal and state-funded sturgeon research.Â Kynard ultimately uncovered the structure of the population, its migratory patterns, and ancient spawning grounds.Â A key finding established that all shortnose head upstream to an ancient spawning pool between Greenfield and Turners Falls known as Rock Dam.Â Less than 2,000 survive today.Â They exist in two groups of a single genetic population, separated over 150 years ago by the raising of Holyoke Damâ€”which luckily had left some adults upstream with access to spawning.Â Fish trapped downstream were out of luck.Â Â
Today, the bulk of the population lives in the river below Holyoke Dam.Â Known as â€œreproductive nulls,â€ some 1,500 sturgeon linger in a forced limbo created by agencies charged with protecting them.Â If one manages to slip into Holyoke Gas & Electricâ€™s fish lift for a spawning ride upstream, it is trapped and pointedly dropped downstreamâ€”per orders of the National Marine Fisheries Service and the MA Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program.Â Surviving for 40 years or more, adults will repeatedly attempt to pass the dam until, genetically unfulfilled, they expire.
NMFS, MA NHESP and USFWS claim this protects sturgeon from being sliced up in HG&Eâ€™s turbines, if they return downstream after spawning.Â All the while HG&E is 5 years in violation of license agreements mandating construction of safe downstream fish passage.Â The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has done nothing to enforce environmental statutes that were key to Holyoke receiving a new hydro license in 1999.
Today, some 300 sturgeon cling to life upstream of Holyoke.Â An unknown number are adults.Â Some attempt to spawn near Rock Dam each spring (females spawn once every 5 yrs).Â Â According to Kynard et al, success is far from guaranteed.Â Unregulated flows emanating from FirstLightâ€™s Northfield Mountain and Turners Falls dam and canal imperil that endangered process.Â Annually, spawning fails 79% of the time at Rock Dam; and 29% of the time at a default site just downstream.Â Fertilized embryos are also killed when waffling flows flush them out, or leave them parching on river banks.Â Many years, no young are produced.
Laws ignored; habitats decimated, river groups mum: itâ€™s a blueprint for extinction.Â Yet, amazingly, our dinosaurs persist. Itâ€™s this springâ€™s teachable moment.Â Anyone up to a challenge?Â
Karl Meyerâ€™s Wild Animals of North America won a 2008 Teachers Choice Award for Childrenâ€™s Books.Â He lives in Greenfield, MA.
Comments Off on The Connecticut River shortnose sturgeon
Posted by karlmeyer on 19 Jan 2012 | Tagged as: American shad, Atlantic salmon, Bellows Falls Fishway, blueback herring, Connecticut River, Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, Connecticut River ecosystem, Conte, CRASC, Dead Reach, ecosystem, federal trust fish, FirstLight, Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Reservoir, river steward, salmon, Salmon eggs, salmon hatchery, sea lamprey, shad, Turners Falls dam, Turners Falls power canal, US Geological Serviceâ€™s Silvio O. Conte Anadromous Fish Lab, Vermont, Vernon Dam Fishway, Walpole
Â© Copyright 2012 by Karl MeyerÂ Â All Rights Reserved
The following Opinion piece appeared in publications and media sites in CT, MA, VT, and NH.Â It is a reply to writing in support of the status quo on the Connecticut River fisheries restoration, emphasizing extinct salmon.Â The writer, Mr. Deen, is a river steward, flyfishing guide, and VT representative.Â This piece appeared mainly in a shorter, Letter to the Editor format.Â Here it appears in an expanded OpEd, this version from The Vermont Digger.Â Find them at www.vtdigger.org.Â
The Connecticut River Watershed Councilâ€™s Vermont River Steward David Dean asks the public not to judge the 45 year-old Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commissionâ€™s fisheries restoration by numbers of returning fish, while 74 salmon reached the CTâ€™s first dam at Holyoke, MA in 2011.Â As someone advocating rededicating funds away from an extinct salmon strain, I found the piece well-intentioned but short on fact.
After decades and hundreds of millions spent on the science, genetics, and hatcheries dedicated to a centuries-extinct, cold-water salmon on the southern-most river it ever briefly colonized, the public has a right to a return on investment in this time of demonstrated climate warming. Â I agree that that return should be an improving river ecosystem.Â Useless dams should be eliminated; hydro operations damaging rivers and skirting regulations protecting fish should be prosecuted.
But Mr. Deen cites as salmon-program benefits â€œgrowing populations of other anadromous fish,â€ specifically shad and lamprey.Â Science is, and should be, about measurable results.Â Yet in results coming back from a hatchery program dedicated to elite angling, salmon represented less than three-hundredths of 1% of this yearâ€™s fish returns, while devouring 90% of funding for all migrants.Â As to the 244,000 American shad and 19,000 sea lamprey he touted as reaching Holyoke–thatâ€™s a 66% plunge from the 720,000 shad counted there two decades back; and 19,000 lamprey?â€”only 4 years have seen lower numbers since tallies began.Â Personally, Iâ€™d note 138 blueback herring–a might shy of the 410,000 Holyoke counted in 1992.
It is time for an ecosystem restoration. Â Turn this upside-down species pyramid back on its base–rededicate funds to bedrock species of this ecosystem.Â River groups could contribute greatly by opening public discussion about desperate river conditions just below Turners Falls, the second dam on the CT. Â Migratory fish there are funneled into an ecosystem death trap: Turners Falls power canal.Â Meanwhile the adjacent Connecticut is strangled in its own bed by pummeling and parching flows–deeply impacted by pumping operations at Northfield Mountain just upstream.
Today, the only shad regularly reaching VT/NH waters are a few hundred sometimes trucked there from Holyoke.Â However, in 2010 Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Station choked on its own silt.Â Its mile-long intake tunnel and turbines became massively clogged.Â From May 1st to November, it did not add a single watt of energy to the grid.Â Few noticed.Â There was no energy interruptionâ€”even while Vermont Yankee was down for refueling in early May.
Yet something amazing happened: shad numbers passing Turners Falls skyrocketed over 600% to levels not seen in 15 years.Â Without Northfield pumping–and with river levels kept steady and artificially high at TF dam as FirstLight Power tried to conceal a 65,000 ton mountain of silt it was dumping in the river, the miserable conditions in the riverbed below the dam actually improved.Â With May and June rains arriving, artificially brimming river levels behind the dam meant more steady flows were released directly downstream to the oft-parched and pummeled â€œdead reachâ€ of river below the falls.Â Shad got their ancient migration route backâ€”swimming upriver, rather than being deflected into the punishing currents and turbines of the Turners Falls power canal.
Even with suspect tallies and FirstLightâ€™s counting equipment inoperable for parts of 37 days, 16,768 shad were counted passing toward VT–the most since 1995.Â Vermont salmon expert Jay McMenemy expressed surprise when all eight free-swimming salmon also used the ancient riverbed to shoot directly upstream to the ladder at the dam.Â Since 1967 over 11 million shad have passed Holyoke.Â All but a whisper of them ever made it to the Green Mountain State, while they once spawned to Bellows Falls and Walpole, NH.Â Ironically, federal studies show 17,000 shad is a shadow of the run that should be passing: at least half of all shad passing Holyoke eventually attempt to pass Turners Falls–95% get deflected into the meat-grinder of currents and turbines of the Turners Falls power canal, never to emerge.
The main reason for no Vermont fish runs: no regulated flows in the riverbed; no easy-access fish lift built upstream at TF dam.Â Â The ecosystem dies in the 2 miles of river directly below Turners Fallsâ€”due in large part to floodgate manipulations to accommodating Northfieldâ€™s pumping. Â There is no working fish passage at Turners Falls.Â It is legally required and should have been in place over a decade back.
Northfield Mountain is a reserve energy source that can produce a large amount of energy, 1,000 megawatts, in a very short time.Â But it can only run for 10 hours, and then its reservoir is depleted.Â It is dead in the water.Â Owners must then go out on the market and buy electricity to divert the Connecticutâ€™s flows uphill to its 5.6 billion gallon reservoir again.Â Then, they sell our river back to us as expensive energy.Â Northfieldâ€™s efficiency is just 67%.Â Add in its profound river impacts and you have to question: Why is no one talking publicly about this ecosystem-killing elephant in the room?
Karl Meyer is an environmental journalist and award-winning non-fiction childrenâ€™s author who writes frequently about Connecticut River issues from along its shores at Greenfield, MA.
Comments Off on Its about the River, AND the Fish…
Posted by karlmeyer on 19 Jan 2012 | Tagged as: American shad, Atlantic salmon, Bellows Falls Fishway, Connecticut River, Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, Connecticut River ecosystem, Conte, CRASC, Dead Reach, didymo, endangerd shortnose sturgeon, Endangered Species Act, ESA, federal trust fish, FERC license, FirstLight, Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Reservoir, Pioneer Valley News, Rock Dam, salmon, salmon hatchery, shad, shortnose sturgeon, The Pioneer, Turners Falls dam, Turners Falls power canal, US Fish & Wildlife Service, US Geological Serviceâ€™s Silvio O. Conte Anadromous Fish Lab, USFWS, Walpole
Â© Copyright 2012 by Karl MeyerÂ Â Â All Rights Reserved
The â€œbig gameâ€ prosecution of Ryan McCulough: another red herring in a failing Connecticut River restoration
(NOTE: the following article first appeared in The Pioneer, January 5, 2012, available now on free newsstands from Springfield, MA to Bellows Falls, VT.Â Â Find it online at: www.pioneervalleynews.com )
Legend has it a reporter once asked career criminal Willy Sutton, aka Slick Willie, to explain his long history of thefts, â€œWilly, why do you rob banks?â€Â Sutton, a master of disguise, purportedly answered in terms as honest as a crisp January day: â€œBecause thatâ€™s where the money is.â€
At criminal proceedings in a jtrial scheduled for January 12, 2012 in State Superior Court at Windsor, VT, accused Atlantic salmon poacher Ryan McCullough will likely be asked why he was fishing downstream of the US Fish & Wildlife Serviceâ€™s White River National Fish Hatchery(WRNFH) last July 25th.Â With the Connecticut River and a failed migratory fish restoration looming as backdrop, Iâ€™m hoping McCullough replies with a similar bit of direct irony: â€œBecause thatâ€™s where they make the fish.â€
Last August a hatchery-bred Atlantic salmon created in controlled environs at the White River hatchery in Bethel, VT, was traced via a receiver to a radio-tag blipping away in the freezer of a nearby home.Â That tag, hidden inside a 31-inch, 9-1/2 lb. salmon, landed the 22 year-old fisherman in hot water. Â McCullough, an aspiring fishing guide, contended he mistook the fish for a huge brown trout.Â Heâ€™s now charged with taking a â€œbig game speciesâ€ under Vermont fish and wildlife statutes. Â Conviction carries a $1,500 fine and a possible 3-year suspension of his hunting and fishing license.
That big game fish McCullough caught was not even remotely connected to a healthy river system.Â It was homing back from the sea to an artificial environment only a factory fish would recognize as habitatâ€”the climate-controlled conduits of WRNFH.Â That aqua-culture facility is part of a 19th century industrial idea: factory production substituted for a working ecosystem under the 44-year old banner of the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission (CRACS)â€™s Connecticut River migratory fish â€œrestoration.â€
The fly-fishing community was abuzz about this incident.Â Yet the only â€œwildâ€ thing about that salmon was its public perception.Â It had been conceived at the hands of humans.Â The egg and milt (sperm) that spawned it had been matched up by computer models, those genetic fluids were mingled together in plastic tubs, swirled by human hands.Â In that immaculately-sterile conception a tiny fish was producedâ€”one of ten million â€œfryâ€ that were later flushed into Connecticut River tributaries to swim to the ocean.Â Every tiny fish produced and released that year along with the one McCullough was to catch two years later was at least two generations removed from any salmon that had ever tasted the salt sea.
In the months just prior to McCulloughâ€™s apprehension fisheries personnel at the Holyoke, MA, fish lift on the Connecticut had intercepted the entire spring salmon â€œrunâ€ from the decades-old, half-billion-dollar-plus effortâ€”still politely referred to as a â€œrestoration.â€Â They trapped all 107 returning fish.Â Of those, all but nine were put in trucks and rushed to sterile, hatchery-lab settings where they were weighed, genetically profiled, vaccinated, quarantined, had their fins clipped, and tissue samples taken.Â All would ultimately be needed as breeding â€œstockâ€ for next years dump of millions of â€œstate-farmedâ€ salmon babies into Connecticut River tributaries.
However, ensuing developments at White River will make it interesting to see if Vermont Fish & Wildlife continues in its attempt to make an example of Ryan McCullough.Â Tragically and ironically, WRNFH was all but washed away by Tropical Storm Irene just weeks after he was brought up on poaching charges.Â A storm surge of White River water entered pools, conduits, wells and buildings throughout the facilityâ€”overwhelming well-water fed fish ponds and carrying in the seeds of didymo, aka Rock Snot.Â Didymo is an easily-spread invasive alga that was discovered upstream of the hatchery 3 years back.Â It smothers river bottom habitats.
Suddenly, tiny salmon fry and over a half-million surviving hatchery fish had become potential carriers of a Rock Snot plague–if they were to be spread in the annual truck-and-dispersal system into Connecticut tributaries and the lakes and streams of four New England states.Â Annual production costs alone for five salmon hatcheries around New England can reach a million bucks per facility.Â Mistakes and the necessity for new â€œbio-securityâ€ protocols and upgrades repeatedly send costs skyrocketing.Â And, after 44 years of trying to create a new strain of cold-loving salmon on the southern-most river it ever colonized, the number of hybrid salmon returning to a warming Connecticut River averages between 40 -100 fish.
A quick damage estimate by USFWS for White River was put at between $10 â€“ 14 million.Â But the hatchery would have to be â€œdepopulated;â€ then sterilized, before any rebuilding could start.Â Theyâ€™d likely have to kill and landfill half a million fish, including hatchery trout and salmon.Â Desperate to put a good spin on this second million-dollar disaster at WRNFH in 3 years, USFWS and CRASC scrambled to find a feel-good PR angle.
Ultimately they â€œreached outâ€ to federally-recognized Native American tribes, inquiring if they would like a â€œgiftâ€ of expensive hatchery salmonâ€”some 8,000 of the table-sized fish were still swimming on site.Â Some tribes immediately accepted.Â CRASC convened quickly to take a unanimous vote legalizing the â€œdonation.â€Â They then began killing, gutted and icing the largest salmon, happy to pass them along to indigenous peoples of the Northeast.Â Within hours of that vote, CRASCâ€™s feel-good â€˜fish-to-the-Indiansâ€™ story hit the media via the Associated Press.
Ironically, the 600 largest of those choice â€œgiftâ€ salmon were near replicas–in size and weight (30 inches, 9 lbs), to the fish Ryan McCullough sits accused of poaching months earlier.Â But at this point it appears the angler can mount a pretty decent defense.Â Back in July heâ€™d actually let a local paper photograph him holding his prize â€œbrown troutâ€ prior to placing it in that freezer.Â Though the photo showed a fish appearing to have the slightly hooked lower jaw of a â€œcockâ€ salmon–that PR move would have been a hugely naÃ¯ve bit of bravado, something a knowing, and aspiring, fishing guide would never do.Â His supporters, including fish and game people, contend he simply may have made a rookie mistake.
Curiously, if heâ€™d purchased a MA fishing license and landed a tagged salmon there, the Bay State penalty would have been akin to a parking ticket: $50 – $100.Â Why??Â MA doesnâ€™t have a hard classification for exactly what these hybrid fish are.Â They arenâ€™t considered a native Connecticut River migratory fish in MA, where the Connecticutâ€™s minor salmon strain has also been extinct for over 200 years.Â This is also likely the reason there isnâ€™t a federal prosecution looming for McCullough.Â Connecticut River Atlantic salmon are officially classified as â€œextirpatedâ€ by the US Fish & Wildlife Service.Â To prosecute him theyâ€™d have to hold a monkey trial with a hybrid fish at its center, a spectacle Darwin himself would shake his head at. Considering the fish give-away status at the WRNFH–and the endlessly-failed Connecticut River salmon restoration program, Vermont is going to look foolish if they donâ€™t let young Ryan McCullough off the hook.
But the Green Mountain State has long had a blind spot about all other native migratory fish on the Connecticut save for extinct salmon.Â Fisheries officials there long-ago staked Vermontâ€™s idea of pristine environments and elite sport fishing on the creation of a new salmon strain to replace one not seen since 1809.Â Decades later, Vermont anglers, as well as those just across the river in New Hampshire, are left without a nifty shad run anglers could be tapping into all the way to Bellows Falls and Walpole.Â They get no fish at all, save spawned-out hatchery lunkers dumped into local lakes as salmon program PR (*USFWS Region 5 put out an official advisory on consuming hatchery salmon way back in 2004).Â Meanwhile, their rivers and tributaries face the ongoing specter of new and potentially-catastrophic emerging fish diseases being spread through hatchery operations in a time of warming climates.
The full ironies of last summerâ€™s comedy of errors become even more apparent looking just south of the Vermont/New Hampshire border to the federal Conte Fish Lab where CRASC meetings are held beside the dead stretch of Connecticut River in Turners Falls, MA.Â CRASC and USFWS are responsible for all the â€œfederal trustâ€ migratory fish on the Connecticut including blueback herring, American shad, and federally endangered shortnose sturgeon.Â Yet there, state and federal fish guardians continue to ignore the riverâ€™s most-critical 2-1/2 mile chasmâ€”one thatâ€™s been key to migratory fish restoration to Vermont and New Hampshire for decades.
Thirty years ago VT and NH shouldâ€™ve begun crying foul due to the lack of accommodating flows and a fish elevator (still yet to be built) directly upstream at Turners Falls dam.Â Implementing those proven remedies–required under federal and state license regulations for migratory fish to reach upstream waters, would long ago have revived those â€œdead reachâ€ flows during spawning seasonâ€”concurrently providing easy upstream passage for very fishable runs of American shad all the way to Walpole, NH and Bellows Falls, VT.Â Today, the Connecticutâ€™s federal trust run of American shad expires in the dead reach below Turners Falls dam, deflected into the treacherous environs of a power canal. Â For decades now VT and NH anglers have been denied fishing for what wouldâ€™ve amounted to millions of 3 â€“ 6 lb. shad, a tasty catch that makes for excellent fishing in anyoneâ€™s book.
Today, funded in part by FirstLight-GDF-Suez, (the global power company manipulating pulses sent downriver from their Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Station, and flows diverted into their Turners Falls Power Canal) USFWS, CRASC, and federal Conte lab researchers continue ignoring the devastation to migrating and spawning river fish from company flow regimes.Â In deference to FirstLightâ€™s preferences, annual agency studies continue emphasizing sending migrating fish into miserable habitats, cross currents, and slicing turbines of the Turners Falls Power Canal. Â Meanwhile, virtually next door to the federal Conte Fish Lab, federal trust American shad runs and whole seasonâ€™s production of eggs and young from the riverâ€™s only spawning population of federally-endangered shortnose whither in a dying reach of river annually.
Perhaps most shameful of all is that there is virtually no federal enforcement or prosecution for the year-in, year-out, damage to those federally endangered sturgeon.Â US Endangered Species Act protections are wholly ignored for this population, which measures only in the hundreds.Â The beleaguered two-mile reach behind the federal Conte Lab has served as their historic mating ground for untold centuries.
Annually, successful shortnose sturgeon spawning in this reach occurs less than half of the time.Â Much of the loss is preventable, and could be stemmed in large part by enforcing environmental statutes that would quell the punishing effects of the water pulses and parching trickles sent downstream by Northfield Mountain/Turners Falls dam operators toward an ancient, low escarpment in the river known as the Rock Dam.Â Shortnose sturgeon have spawned at this site since before well before Columbus sailed.
More losses arise from the companyâ€™s spawning-season water diversions intoâ€”and out of, the Turner Falls Power Canal.Â That flow can be, alternately, either so strong, or so halting, that it can stop an entire seasonâ€™s worth of sturgeon mating dead in its tracks.Â Or, those same vacillating pulses will either wash downstream, or strand, a seasonâ€™s worth of tiny sturgeon embryos–leaving them to decay beneath the silt, or desiccate on barren riverbanks.Â Either way, a yearâ€™s worth of endangered shortnose sturgeon production regularly gets sideswiped to oblivion.
The penalty to an individual for catching, killing or interfering with a federally endangered shortnose sturgeon is up to a year in jail, and a $100,000 dollar fine per instance.Â That penalty is increased to $200,000 for corporations, which seems a bit out of balance.Â Right at Turners Falls–adjacent to the US Geological Serviceâ€™s Silvio O. Conte Anadromous Fish Lab and just downstream from the US Fish & Wildlife Serviceâ€™s Great Falls Discovery Center, there is documented evidence of annual damage to the Connecticut Riverâ€™s only spawning population of endangered shortnose sturgeon, yet here no one is being dragged into courtâ€¦
At the November 10, 2011 CRASC meeting in Turners Falls, USFWSâ€™s Connecticut River Coordinator Ken Sprankle announced the outlines and some preliminary observations from a multi-year American shad migration study heâ€™s begun.Â With assistance, Sprankle caught and radio-tagged over a hundred shad, some at the mouth of the Connecticut, some at the Holyoke fish lift.Â This allowed him to track their movements via receivers placed along the river as they made their upstream runs.Â Partly funded by FirstLight Power, federal Conte Lab researcher Dr. Ted Castro-Santos partnered on the Sprankle study.Â Castro-Santos was the point person responsible for siting receivers along the river from downstream of the Turners Falls Power Canal up to the Vernon dam in Vermont.
Sprankle termed the undertaking a â€œwhole river study for shad,â€ one that would help in understanding how they use the river in migration.Â He further noted that Dr. Castro-Santos had placed radio receivers throughout FirstLightâ€™s Turners Falls Power Canal.Â At that point I asked how many receivers had been set up in the â€œactual river bedâ€â€”referring to the Connecticutâ€™s embattled, 2-mile â€œdead reachâ€ just beyond Conte Labs west windows.Â As expected, he answered that none were in place to monitor that section or river.Â Itâ€™s remains the riverâ€™s missing link.
Thus, from the foot of the Turners Falls canal to the base of Turners Falls dam, Sprankle and Castro-Santos will have no data on shad movement in a critical river reach.Â I pointed out to Sprankle that the undertaking could not then be considered a bona fide â€œwhole river study for shad.â€Â This is decidedly a broken river studyâ€”missing the miles of streambed where a riverâ€™s ocean-connected ecosystem dies.Â I further observed that the section Castro-Santos has chosen to monitor promotes a power â€œcanal restorationâ€â€”a configuration that has failed for the past 40 years, and one that letâ€™s the power company wholly off the hook in terms of sustainable flows for federally-endangered shortnose sturgeon and working, direct, upstream fish passage for federal trust American shad.
Ryan McCullough is scheduled to appear on Thursday, January 12, 2011, in Room 1 of Vermont Superior Court in Windsor at 9:00 a.m.Â He is pleading not guilty to the charge of knowingly taking a â€œbig game speciesâ€ and has chosen to be tried by jury, represented by attorny Jordanna Levine.
Comments Off on THE “BIG GAME” PROSECUTION of RYAN MCCULLOUGH: another red herring in a failing Connecticut River restoration
Posted by karlmeyer on 21 Dec 2011 | Tagged as: American shad, Anne Makepeace, Atlantic salmon, blueback herring, Captain William Turner, Connecticut River, Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, CRASC, Daily Hampshire Gazette, Dead Reach, didymo, federal trust fish, Jessie Little Doe, Narragansett, Pilgrims, Rock Dam, Rock Snot, Rutland Herald, shortnose sturgeon, The Greenfield Recorder, Times Argus, Turners Falls dam, US Fish & Wildlife Service, USFWS, Wampanoag, William Pynchon
The following essay appeared on the November OpEd pages of the Rutland Herald, Times Argus, Greenfield Recorder, and Daily Hampshire Gazette.
December 21, 2011
Copyright Â© 2011 by Karl MeyerÂ Â Â Â All Rights Reserved
A Mirror to the Past: the legacy of failure at Turners Falls
Some history is worth repeating.Â In Deerfield, MA on November 9th I listened as independent filmmaker Anne Makepeace introduced, â€œWe Still Live Hereâ€ in a church at a place once called Pocumtuck.Â There in 1638, Springfieldâ€™s William Pynchon bargained with the Pocumtuck for 500 dirt-cheap bushels of cornâ€”selling it at inflated prices to Connecticut colonists whoâ€™d run out of food while warring against the Pequot. Â The Pequot massacre at Fort Mystic, as well as Pynchonâ€™s low-ball trading, established a posture toward Native Americans that overran a continent.
But Ms. Makepeaceâ€™s documentary displayed a clear sensitivity in depicting the 18-year odyssey of a Wampanoag woman, Jessie Little Doe. Â Through vision and genius, a seemingly-everyday working mom has begun reviving the spoken Wampanoag language, last heard over a century ago.Â At Mashpee and Gay Head, MA, a bedrock tongue of indigenous North America is again being taught and spoken, where starving Pilgrims first encountered it.
The next evening the Associated Press published a story: â€˜Rock Snotâ€™ Fear Means Salmon For Native Tribes.Â It told how the disaster of an invasive alga picked up by thousands of hatchery salmon at the US Fish &Wildlife Serviceâ€™s flooded White River National Fish Hatchery during Tropical Storm Irene was turning into a curious windfall for Native Americans.Â The USFWS and Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission (CRASC) had just unanimously voted to give free fish to the Indians.
The headline was unfortunate, sounding like the tribes were being used.Â CRASCâ€™s half-billion-dollar CT River salmon restoration had had another dismal yearâ€”returning just 106 fish.Â The Irene flood was the second million-dollar disaster befalling the White River VT hatchery in 4 years.Â Giving a tiny portion of the facilityâ€™s half-million surviving fish might play better in the media than advertising a likely fate for mostâ€”killing and burying the lot to avoid releasing rock-snot-infested salmon and trout to New England rivers and Great Lakes habitats.
Filed from Montpelier, VT, the story sketched that morningâ€™s CRASC meeting at Turners Falls, MA, once known as Peskeomscut, just 7 miles from Pocumtuck.Â It missed some substance an attending reporter mightâ€™ve caught–that CRASC Chair Bill Hyatt had become chairman that day; that it was his first meeting ever.Â Hyattâ€™s quotes hit the media so quicklyâ€”hours after the meeting, it might appear someone had been spoon fed a cheery â€œsalmon-for-the-Indiansâ€ pre-Thanksgiving tale.Â But an editor made a good call on its content: rock-snot-means-gift-to-tribes.
On-the-ground reporting might also have uncovered thatâ€”just beyond the federal Conte Lab where CRASC meets, sits two miles of beleaguered Connecticut River identified on colonial maps as Peskeomscut.Â Itâ€™s a delicate place to fashion an â€˜Indian-fish-rescueâ€™ story from.Â Here on May 19, 1676, Captain William Turner and Hadley-based soldiers surprise-attacked hundreds of sleeping Wampanoags, Narragansetts, Pocumtucks and Nipmucks–largely women, children, and elders. Theyâ€™d come to rest, plant, and dry-harvest massive blooms of migrating shad, herring, and a knot of spawning shortnose sturgeon.Â If time allowed, theyâ€™d tap a small, later-arriving salmon run.
Time did not.Â This was King Phillips War, their fight for sovereign lands.Â Dawn brought the Turners Falls massacre.Â Just past Conte Labâ€™s windows warriors encamped at the ancient fishing-island today called Rock Dam counterattacked–routing and killing 37, including Captain Turner.
This day, 335 years later, it was noted that half the hatcheryâ€™s 8,000, two-to-four year old salmon, the small ones, could likely be released to already didymo-infected rivers.Â Regulations would prevent any sale. Â Still, all remaining baby salmon, plus 500,000 didymo-infected lake trout still faced a quick landfill burial before the hatchery could be flushed with chlorine.Â They could not be released for anglersâ€”and way back in 2004 the USFWS Region 5 actually issued a consumer advisory on eating hatchery salmon.Â Those remaining 4,000 larger salmon, some to 9-1/2 lbs., might also have had to be killed and land-filled–had they not found someone to take themâ€¦
CRASC, charged with protecting all of the riverâ€™s migratory fish species, unanimously voted to donate those big fishâ€”killed, gutted and iced, to any federally tribe whoâ€™d take them.Â It might be a PR coup for the disastrous restoration, buffering perceptions away from the millions lost producing ten dozen salmon returns annually.Â As with the Pilgrims, Pynchon and William Turner, the Indians had not come calling: USFWS had.Â Region 5â€™s William Archambault noted, â€œWe reached out to the federal tribes.â€ Ironically, that included the Wampanoag and Narragansett.
I hope all fully understood that in accepting fish they did USFWS a huge favor.Â They should also know the embattled 2-mile reach of river they know as Peskeomscut remains today a desolate place.Â There, USFWS and CRASC have abandoned spawning federally-endangered shortnose sturgeon and beleaguered American shad to the excesses of a for-profit power company.Â Certainly they know that Jessie Little Doe was awarded a MacArthur genius grant in 2010.Â â€œWe Still Live Hereâ€ premiered nationwide on November 17th, funded in part by WGBY in Springfield, MA.
#Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â #Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â #
Comments Off on Mirror to the Past: a legacy of failure at Turners Falls
Posted by karlmeyer on 13 Nov 2011 | Tagged as: alewives, American shad, Atlantic salmon, blueback herring, Connecticut River, Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, Connecticut River ecosystem, CRASC, didymo, MA Division of Fish and Wildlife, Rock Snot, salmon, Salmon eggs, salmon hatchery, shortnose sturgeon, US Fish & Wildlife Service, USFWS
Copyright Â© 2011 by Karl MeyerÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â All Rights Reserved
This article first appeared in the Pioneer Valley News, www.pioneervalleynews.com, on November 9, 2011.Â Hard copies of the free Pioneer Valley News are available at many locations from Holyoke, MA through Brattleboro and Bellows Falls, VT.
DESPERATE MEASURES: salmon program a grave threat to the CT River
TURNERS FALLS, MA.Â â€œDidymo is not going to drive our decisions,â€ said Dr. Caleb Slater, Anadromous Fish Project Leader for the MA Div. of Fish & Wildlife and Tech Committee Chair of the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission (CRASC) at a hastily convened CRASC meeting September 23, 2011.Â Their 44 year-old federal/state salmon restoration program was in crisis, having again produced just nine-dozen returning fish on the year. Â Now, their main hybrid salmon hatchery had been reduced to rubble by rampaging White River waters from Tropical Storm Irene.Â But moving out the surviving salmon at the White River National Fish Hatchery (WRNFH) in Bethel, VT, posed a big problem: it could potentially increase the spread of river-bottom smothering â€œdidymoâ€ throughout the Connecticut River basin.
CRASC and its US Fish and Wildlife Service partners were scrambling at the Conte Anadromous Fish Lab, trying to figure out how best to lobby federal representatives to get $10 – $14 million in â€œemergency Congressional fundingâ€ to â€œcompletely rebuildâ€ USFWSâ€™s White River hatchery.Â Theyâ€™d even brought back Jay McMenemy, recently retired from VT Fish & Game, and CRASCâ€™s Tech Committee, and seated him at the members table.Â CRASCâ€™s Steve Gephard of Connecticutâ€™s DEP was worried officials might not be willing to again resuscitate this facility to produce its main product: 5 million salmon fry released to the Connecticut River each spring, â€œYou guys have to do that lobbying,â€ said William Archambault, USFWS Region 5 Deputy Assistant Regional Director of Fisheries.Â A week prior his boss, USFWS Region 5 Director Wendy Weber sent a letter to Washington outlining the giant funding request.
But first, WRNFH would have to be completely â€œde-populated,â€ then â€œdisinfected,â€ according to Archambault.Â There were also other significant risks involved in doling-out itâ€™s surviving fish beyond spreading didymo–a bottom-smothering algae known as Rock Snot that New England states have been working hard to contain. Â Nonetheless Archambault was encouraging CRASC members from VT, CT, MA and NH to quickly find a way to parse-out the 900 surviving â€œbroodstockâ€ salmon left at the hatchery to a handful of federal and state hatcheries–and also to find places to release remaining excess â€œstockâ€ into lakes and basin streams.Â Caleb Slater remarked on how stocking spawned-out hatchery salmon to Bay State ponds â€œgets a real PR boostâ€ from anglers.Â Once the $ millions in emergency public funds were in hand, CRASC and USFWS could start all over.
â€œAs a Service weâ€™re uncomfortable with the risks,â€ Archambault said as disclaimer, â€œIt (the decision to accept potentially tainted fish) will have to be done on a state-by-state basis.Â We canâ€™t be 100% sure that didymo wonâ€™t be taken out of the facility.â€Â Spawning the survivors at White River was out of the question.Â Those salmon had been newly-exposed by the dace, white suckers and other fish–living and dead, which had mixed into the crippled facility when Irene sent them upstream infected waters where didymo had been found in the White River four years prior. â€œOur focus is on rebuilding, not spawning right now,â€ said Archambault.
Alternatively, theyâ€™d have to again destroy all surviving hatchery fish and eggsâ€”an extreme procedure that had been employed twice recently at White River facility.
But fall breeding season was arriving.Â Full hatchery productionâ€”â€œstrippingâ€ salmon females of eggs and mixing in the milt of surviving sea-run males (whoâ€™d be injected with stimulating hormones a week prior), could not wait long.Â They could delay injections a week or two, tricking the hybrids.Â But then staff would have to get down to fish productionâ€”mixing the genetic fish fluids by hand, careful that computer-matched genes of certain fish were mingled into the correct plastic eggs tubs; then placing fertilized hybrid eggs on industrial racks to be washed over by an endless stream of water.
But there was another big catch: the ever-present and growing risk of centralized hatcheries spreading emerging fish diseases. Â Before any surviving WRNFH salmon could be moved theyâ€™d have to be tested; quarantined for 28 days.Â Hatchery salmon can spread a variety of plagues deadly to river systems and new fish populationsâ€”including angler-beloved native brook trout and still-wild salmon populations clinging to survival in rivers up north.Â All WRNFH fish would have to be quickly screened for Infectious Salmon Anemia (ISA), Furunculosis, and Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis (IPN)–a disease discovered infecting salmon downstream in 2007 at the Cronin National Salmon Station in Sunderland, MA.
From there, federal biologists had ferried that deadly virus 140 miles north to the Vermontâ€™s WRNFH–through the salmon eggs Cronin Station sent them for winter incubation. Both WRNFH and Cronin Station were subsequently depopulated; chemically disinfected.Â Personnel at Cronin had to kill all 121 â€œsea-runâ€ salmon on-station that fall. Â It was the publicâ€™s seasonal return on 40 years and over a $ half-billion spent on hybrid efforts to create a substitute fish for a strain extinct here since 1809. Â Ten dozen fish were the Connecticutâ€™s entire salmon â€œrunâ€ back from the ocean in 2007; when their program began in 1967 theyâ€™d predicted 37,000 salmon annually.Â WRNFH staff also incinerated all 718,000 salmon eggs it had begun nursing for the following yearâ€™s stocking. Â Of the millions of fry delivered into Connecticut River tributaries the next season–by school kids, trout groups and fisheries technicians, not a single baby salmon would come directly from a fish that had arrived back from the ocean.Â All fry stocked into the ecosystem from Cronin and White River that spring were at least two industrial generations removed from anything that natural.
Following that 2007 disaster over $500,000 in emergency-funded â€œbio-securityâ€ upgrades had to be put in place at the USFWSâ€™s Cronin Station in Sunderand, MA.Â A similar mix of costly hardware and complex chemical protocols were installed at WRNFH.
But just months after the IPN debacle of 2008, disaster again struck WRNFH.Â Upstream in the same White River waters the hatchery used to nurture its eggs, didymo was discovered choking the bottom.Â WRNFH now risked spreading this algal plaque through the Connecticut River basin via hatchery salmon.Â They could no longer use the very river water they were expecting their hybrid salmon to be restored to.Â No water, equals no hatchery.Â Again, CRASC and USFWS put out an SOS for emergency public funds for White River â€”and, again, millions in public funding was procured to design, dig and computerize a segregated system of wells and piping to water their fish, eggs, and fry.
In 2010 yet another disaster befell WRNF.Â A sampling of young salmon groups being raised from eggs for CT River stocking programs revealed that 60% of those hatchery fish were developing cataracts, crippling their ability to feed.Â Again, thousands had to be destroyed.Â No publicly-disclosed disasters were known to befall WRNFH or Cronin National Salmon Station in 2010, yet White River infrastructure consumed $723,000 in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) cash for â€œupgradesâ€â€”the bulk of it funneled to corporations far from New England.Â Over $590,000 in contracts for electrical upgrades and new â€œchillersâ€ went to two firms: one in Missouri and the other Washington State.
THIS DAY, just four years after the IPN outbreak; just three years after the didymo crisis and new well fields, one year after cataractsâ€”and a year after a yet another WRNFH Recover Act cash infusion, the USFWS, CRASC and the White River National Fish Hatchery are going to the mattress to save their foundered hatchery at all costs.Â Didymo, and the millions of dollars spent to protect against its spread throughout the Connecticut River watershed, are being downplayed as just the price of doing business.
The plan coming out of this emergency CRASC meeting at Conte Lab, is to disease-test the White River salmon ASAP; then quickly get them dispersed and â€œbredâ€ at other sites including Sunderlandâ€™s Cronin National Salmon Station.Â In another unprecedented move, they would then transport, hatch, and feed several million salmon fry until spring at hatcheries in river basins across New England: North Attleboro National Fish Hatchery in the Ten Mile River basin in North Attleboro, MA, the Berkshire National Fish Hatchery in the Housatonic basin in New Marlboro, MA,Â Cronin National Salmon Station in the Connecticut basin in Sunderland, MA, the formerly-mothballed Whittemore Salmon Station on the Farmington at Barkhamsted, CT, and Eisenhower National Fish Hatchery in the Otter Creek/Lake Champlain drainage basin in North Chittendon, VT.Â Come spring, those baby hybrid salmon fry would get re-dispersed againâ€”stocked-out by trout groups, school children, and fish and wildlife staff to a vast network of Connecticut River tributaries.
It was desperate, seat-of-the-pants, industrial fish science policy-in-the-making by the USFWS and CRASCâ€™s various state fish and wildlife officials.Â And it was fraught with opportunity for miscalculations, mistakes and dire consequences for the web of linked ecosystems they are charged with protecting.Â As with all bureaucracies, USFWSâ€™s Bill Archambault quietly mentioned a Plan B to procure public funds if Congress balked at this latest hatchery cash pitch.Â WRNFH had recently done a bit of branching out into work other than just salmon production for the Connecticut.Â They were now hatching â€œKlondikes,â€ lake trout for stocking in Lake Michigan.Â It might be possible to â€œuse Great Lakes moneyâ€ to resurrect White River, Archambault said.
CRASC members and the hatchery personnel in attendance left the Tech meeting that afternoon with one big, gnarly question sitting fat and unanswered on the table: would their plan disperse didymo?Â You canâ€™t vaccinate against an algae spread via tiny plant bits carried in fish gills or transported in hatchery fry or egg-nurturing waters.Â Yet almost to a one, theyâ€™d expressed a blind willingness to risk spreading that plague.Â Even if all emergency disease tests proved negative, no one stepped-up to guarantee there wouldnâ€™t be the seeds of didymo hiding in fish transported to new river basins, or in the necessary waters required for shuttling those live fish and eggs.Â To his credit CRASCâ€™s Matt Carpenter from New Hampshire Fish & Game kept returning to worries about spreading didymo.Â After a pause, long-time CRASC leader Steve Gephard from CT DEP offered, â€œWeâ€™re using salt solutions,â€ but it came across sounding like soft science, and he too added his disclaimer, â€œNo guarantees can be made.â€
In the group-think being employed to save the program and sway Carpenter, Gephard then went on to restate the PR value of dispersing spawned-out salmon to swim in the basinâ€™s rivers for casual anglers. Â But, there was nothing eco-system-natural in his language, it was purely industrial, â€œIf weâ€™re going to save this program weâ€™re going to have to come up with a way to keep fish in production.â€Â Of the decades-old system created to produce a new stand-in fish for a cold-water species centuries-extinct on todayâ€™s climate-warmed Connecticut (now classified a â€˜warm water fisheryâ€™) Gephard warned, â€œIf we get down to the point where we get back 10 fish a year–its like death from a thousand cuts, the public isnâ€™t going to accept this program.â€
These were the plans and decisions USFWS and CRASCâ€™s Tech Committee took away with them at the end of a four hour meeting on September 23, 2011.Â It was expected theyâ€™d be discussed and accepted at a full, semi-annual Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission meeting just six days hence.Â However, without explanation, an emergency notice went out from CRASCâ€™s Executive Secretary Ken Sprankle at his office in Sunderland, MA, just days later, September 27, 2011: â€œI have just been directed by CRASC Vice Chairman Wayne MacCallum to POSTPONE the September 29th CRASC meeting until further notice.â€ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â #Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â #Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â #
Authorâ€™s addendum: Upon finishing this writing as the Nov/Dec. issue of Pioneer Valley News was set to go to press, no official notice had been made of when that postponed CRASC meeting would reconvene.Â Yesterday (10/25/11), I learned it will likely take place November 10, 2011, but that was still unofficial.Â What, if any, of these decisions have been implemented in the interim five weeks is unknown at this time.Â More about CRASC plans, changes and decisions may be revealed at that next meeting.Â However, when I recently noted the Publicâ€™s Right-to-Know, and asked for specifics and notes from backroom negotiations between USFWSâ€™s John Warner and FirstLight Power/GDF-Suez to divert more migratory fish out of the Connecticut River and into the treacherous Turners Falls power canal, Warner refused to give a direct answer.Â His colleague at that CRASC meeting, USFWS Region 5 Deputy Assistant Director of Fisheries Bill Archambault, then pointedly stepped in and referred me to the Freedom of Information Act.Â CRASC is a Congressionally-authorized public entity that tends to share little upfront information with the public (costs, budgets, open-meeting dates, disease threats, etc.) beyond what is self-promoting for their salmon program.
This story comes directly from an emergency CRASC Technical Committee meeting.Â There should be no mistake that these decisions–and the gambles being advocated with the Connecticut River ecosystem, were being promoted by key federal and state decision makers at CRASC and USFWS.Â Dr. Caleb Slater is Anadromous Fish Project Leader for the MA Div. of Fish & Wildlife; Dr. Steve Gephard is Supervisor of Inland Fisheries for CT DEP, CRASCâ€™s Genetics Subcommittee Chair, liaison to the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission, and former international representative to NASCO (North Atlantic Salmon Commission); Wendy Weber is Region 5 US Fish & Wildlife Service Regional Director, William Archambault is USFWS Region 5 Deputy Assistant Regional Director of Fisheries; John Warner of the USFWSâ€™s New England Field Office is CRASCâ€™s Fish Passage Subcommittee Chair; Jay McMenemy (retired, but somehow again seated at that CRASC table) of VT Fish & Wildlife was CRASCâ€™s Salmon Studies Subcommittee Chair, and a key long-time promoter of the Atlantic Salmon Egg Rearing Program (ASERP) in VTâ€™s schools.Â Â Matthew Carpenter, CRASCs lone voice of question and potential dissent that day, attended the meeting via speaker phone.Â He is Anadromous Fish Program Coordinator for New Hampshire Fish & Game.
What is clear is that this program and its insular decision-making process represent an ongoing danger to the Connecticut River ecosystem.Â As long as the public remains unaware of the costs and consequences of continuing to spend tens of millions of dollars on a coldwater fish strain that went extinct on the southern-most edge of its historical footprint over 200 years ago, the USFWS and CRASC will continue to dump 6 million factory fry into the Connecticut River system each spring.Â In turn, weâ€™ll continue to see a return of 10 dozen or so fish from the sea, ad infinitum, if our representatives continue funding a program with hybrid salmon at its core.
Conservatively calculating that the basic salmon restoration effortâ€”in a year without new disease or disaster, costs taxpayers a minimum of $10 million annually (salaries aside)–the cost for the 91 â€œwildâ€ sea-run salmon returning from the Atlantic this year was $110,000 per fish.Â Add to that any number of â€œbadâ€ years with an emerging disease or disaster–pitch in say another $14 million from public coffers, and the price of one returned hybrid salmon goes to $264,000.Â Â Each of these then must be ferried right back to the hatchery for next yearâ€™s production.
And that doesnâ€™t begin to calculate the huge â€œwhat-ifs?â€â€¦didymo, ISA, IPN gets shipped out of the salmon factoriesâ€¦
In recent OpEds from Holyoke, MA to Bellows Falls and Montpelier, VT, Iâ€™ve taken the position that the Connecticut River desperately needs a well-funded restoration program.Â But it should be an ecosystem restoration program, not one based on a failed 19th century idea that substitutes fish hatcheries for functioning river systems, and prioritizes an extinct species ahead of a still-living pyramid that includes native alewives, American shad, blueback herring, endangered shortnose sturgeon, sea lamprey and American eels.Â With less than half the $14 million USFWS and CRASC hope will rescue their program you could build a state-of-the-art ecosystem laboratory.Â It would an excellent fit for the Five College areaâ€”where advances in upstream ecosystem restoration remain stalled behind Turners Falls dam, as they have since its construction in 1798.
With such a facility in place, you could easily attract endowment fundingâ€”and start producing independent science.Â CRASC, and Conte Labâ€™s state and federal scientists and studies are now regularly contracted with, and supported by, money from power companies operating on the Connecticutâ€”companies concerned with maximizing profit.Â Â Corporations have little interest seeing independent science come to light that would quantify for the public their true impacts on New Englandâ€™s River.
At minimum, itâ€™s high time to stop the losses the Connecticut River ecosystem is sustaining from propping up a dangerously failed hatchery program.Â Invest in keeping the Connecticutâ€™s remaining half-dozen, naturally-breeding migratory species alive and moving upstream.
Karl Meyer, Greenfield, MA, October 26, 2011.
Comments Off on DESPERATE MEASURES : salmon hatchery program a grave threat to the Connecticut River
Posted by karlmeyer on 09 Nov 2011 | Tagged as: American shad, Atlantic salmon, blueback herring, Connecticut River, Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, Connecticut River ecosystem, Conte, CRASC, didymo, MA Division of Fish and Wildlife, Rock Snot, salmon hatchery, Turners Falls power canal, US Fish & Wildlife Service
The PIONEER VALLEY NEWS will be out on news stands beginning tomorrow, November 10th.Â Right now you can read about the last meeting of the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, aka CRASC, on-line at:Â www.pioneervalleynews.com ,
Or simply type in the link below.
The Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, aka CRASC, meets tomorrow, November 10, at 10 a.m. at the USGS Silvio Conte Anadromous Fish Lab in Turners Falls.Â Though the meetings are not publicly announced, this is the federal/state public entity responsible for protecting migratory fish and the Connecticut River ecosystem–fisheries officials responsible for protecting runs of blueback herring, American shad, and the Connecticut’s only spawning population of federally-endangered shortnose sturgeon.
The public can attend these meetings, and should be made aware of them.Â To attend tomorrow, take the 11th Street Bridge across the Turners Falls Power Canal, go left at the first stop sign, and follow down along the widened power canal until you see Conte Lab on the right.Â Parking is right there.
Comments Off on Desperate Measures: portrait of a CRASC Meeting
Posted by karlmeyer on 31 Oct 2011 | Tagged as: American shad, Atlantic salmon, Connecticut River, Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, Connecticut River ecosystem, didymo, Rock Snot, Salmon eggs, salmon hatchery, Turners Falls dam, Turners Falls power canal, US Fish & Wildlife Service, USFWS
The following OpEd appeared in MA and VT publications, including at: www.gazettenet.com; www.recorder.com , www.rutlandherald.com;Â www.timesargus.com; www.commonsnews.org;Â and The Montague Reporter, www.montaguema.net . Â My apologies go to USFWS Region 5 Director Wendy Weber for incorrectly spelling her name and noting her as â€œActingâ€ Director in the original. Â They are here-in corrected.
Ms. Weber formally replied to my piece in the Daily Hampshire Gazette on Friday, October 29th .Â I appreciate her thoughtful response, and welcome the prospect that an evaluation of the 44 year old salmon-creation effort might lead to real USFWS policy change here on the Connecticut.Â A true restoration effort desperately needs to focus on the living migratory species still diverted into the debased habitats at the Turners Falls power canal.Â The Connecticut River itself remains all but dead as a river system for the two miles immediately below Turners Falls dam.
I stick by my characterization that this group of ranking federal/state fisheries officials were indeed ready to â€œplay fast and looseâ€ with the Connecticutâ€™s ecosystem as they left their Sept. 23rd emergency CRASC Tech Committee meeting.Â The â€œaskâ€–noted at that meeting, was indeed stated as $14 million in â€œemergencyâ€ Congressional funding. Â I put together my OpEd, to denote the dangers of spreading didymo,Â and get the issue into the public record.Â Days later an emergency dispatch went out cancelling the scheduled Sept. 29, 2011 meeting of the full CRASC, where the proposed emergency fish-dispersing measures would have presumably been adopted.Â That meeting has been rescheduled for November 10, 20011, 10:00 a.m., at the federal Conte Anadromous Fish Lab in Turners Falls.Â CRASC is a public entity, thus the public may attend.
I would love to see USFWS hold an open public forum on the future of the Connecticut River migratory fisheries restoration program.Â I would be happy be a part of such a panel.Â My original OpEd is below.
Karl Meyer, Greenfield, MA, Oct. 31, 2011
ORIGINAL OpEd text below
Oct. 5, 2011Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Copyright Â© 2011 by Karl Meyer
USFWS requests $14 million in â€œemergencyâ€ funds for hatchery as native fish runs founder
Wendy Weber, Region 5 Director of the US Fish and Wildlife Service in Hadley, MA, and Deputy Assistant Regional Director of Fisheries Bill Archambault, want a boatload of pork for the failed Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commissionâ€™s (CRASCâ€™s) salmon program.Â Now!Â Through an Act of Congress they are seeking $10 – $14 million in emergency funding to rebuild the White River National Fish Hatchery (WRNFH) in Bethel, VT, wiped out by Tropical Storm Irene in August.Â Webber sent out a letter requesting the Congressional funds in mid-September.Â The primary product of WRNFH is salmon eggsâ€”six million annually for our riverâ€™s longest running failure, the 44 year attempt to recreate an extinct salmon strain here: 107 fish returned this season.Â What will Senators Kerry, Brown, Leahy and Sanders do with this request in a time of paper-thin budgets and collapsing native herring and shad runs?
Last year, the WRNFH got $723,000 in federal stimulus funds for a makeover–over $420,000 went to a refrigeration manufacturer in Missouri for an egg-chiller.Â Ironically, a $100,000 egg chiller has sat useless at the Cronin National Salmon Station in Sunderland, MA for years.Â Upon delivery, it simply never worked.Â Four years ago White River spent millions in taxpayer dollars to build a well system to supply its hatchery salmonâ€”upstream the White River had become infected with the invasive, bottom-smothering algae didymo, which could be transported via eggs and fry they disperse to tributaries and sent to school programs. They want to start again.
Meanwhile, state/federal CRASC Commissioners seem willing to play fast and loose with the potentially-disastrous dispersal of didymo to CT River tributaries through hatchery fry.Â Right now they are devising a rush plan to parcel out the surviving 900 â€œbroodstockâ€ hatchery salmon at White River to hatcheries in MA, VT, and CTâ€”though they admit they canâ€™t be â€œone hundred percent certain didymo wonâ€™t be taken out of the (White River) facility.â€ Â Theyâ€™d jeopardize an ecosystem for their program.
All this was revealed at an emergency CRASC Tech Committee meeting on September 23, 2011.Â This capital-intensive, million dollar system of four federal and two state hatcheries, floats a small number of well-benefitted government jobs, while ignoring native migrant fish and the lessons of a river ecosystem.Â Itâ€™s a PR machine reaching into public schools, assisted via a few hundred, spawned-out hatchery salmon dumped into lakes and streams to mollify anglers duped into believing it will work.
With $14 million you could do a lot of good for the Connecticut.Â With just a fraction of that money, independent scientists could conduct investigations and get real answers about why millions of migratory American shad have remained blocked from getting upstream to Vermont and New Hampshire on the main stem Connecticut at Turners Falls for decades, abandoned to a treacherous power canal literally behind the federal Conte Fish Lab.Â A tiny share of those dollars could begin getting real answers to why a flood of 630,000 blueback herring passing Holyoke dam in 1985 collapsed like the September Red Sox to a â€œrunâ€ of 138 fish here in 2011.
Less than half of $14 million could easily build an independent, Five College-based river ecology lab that would advance our understanding of native fish, the food web, and the mix of seasonal life cycles critical to sustaining a healthy ecosystem.Â MA is the crossroads of the Connecticutâ€”where migratory fish have remained blocked from VT and NH waters since 1798.Â Once built, a sustaining endowment could surely be found for such a facility.Â New Englandâ€™s River would finally have a think tank worthy of its critical importance.
Today, just a few hundred thousand could easily get an answer to the simple question thatâ€™s left New Englanders in the dark for generations: Why hundreds of millions of dollars spent on an extinct, cold water fish is never going to sustain anything but pork production for the 44 year old Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission–on a warmingÂ river in the era of climate change.
In 1967, New Englanders from Enfield, CT to Walpole, NH, and Bellows Falls, VT were promised great fishing and a bounty of seafood by the New England Cooperative Fisheries Restoration Program, todayâ€™s CRASC.Â The chief objective of this federal/state amalgam: â€œprovide the public with high quality sport fishing opportunities in a highly urbanized area as well as to provide for the long term needs of the population for seafood.â€Â Â Runs of a million American shad, commercially harvestable blueback herring returnsâ€”and a hypothetical run of fishable (though centuries extinct) salmon were promised.Â Instead, weâ€™re left with an endless conveyor of salmon pork, no seafood–and damned poor fishing.
Itâ€™s time to stop this recklessness and waste on the Connecticut–time for accountability from the USFWS.Â Jettison the Age-of-Aquarius salmon scheme; refocus the program on still-living native runs.Â A new name, the â€œConnecticut River Migratory Fisheries Commissionâ€ would help; all new commissioners and an ecosystem focus would be a real start.
USFWS Region 5 Director Wendy Weberâ€™s piece from the Gazette can be found at:
Comments Off on USFWS requests $14 million in â€œemergencyâ€ funds for hatchery as native fish runs founder
Posted by karlmeyer on 24 Jul 2011 | Tagged as: American shad, Atlantic salmon, Bellows Falls Fishway, blueback herring, Connecticut River, Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, Connecticut River ecosystem, Conte, CRASC, Dead Reach, EPA, federal trust fish, FERC license, FirstLight, MA Division of Fish and Wildlife, MA Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, New Hampshire, Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Reservoir, salmon, salmon hatchery, Sanctuary Magazine, shortnose sturgeon, The Greenfield Recorder, The Springfield Republican, Turners Falls power canal, USFWS, Walpole
Copyright Â© 2011 by Karl MeyerÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â All Rights Reserved.
* The following article first appeared in the July/August 2011 issue of the Pioneer Valley News.
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ITâ€™S THE DEAD REACH, STUPID: the selling of the Connecticut River ecosystem
If you think the Connecticut River is worth saving for your children and their grandchildren, youâ€™d better act fast.Â New Englandâ€™s River is dying in the two-mile stretch directly below the dam in Turners Falls, MA.Â Go take a look.Â Itâ€™s a section subjected, alternately, to channel-starving flows and punishing deluges caused by manipulations at the dam from the Northfield Mountain-Turners Falls hydropower operations.Â Look just to the left, where roiling water churns and hurtles down the Turners Falls Power Canal.Â Thatâ€™s where most of the riverâ€™s water goesâ€”into an unnatural conduit thatâ€™s the final stop for most of the Connecticutâ€™s migratory fish.Â Itâ€™s killing this ocean-connected ecosystem, which once stretched north to Walpole, NH and Bellows Falls, VT.
For decades US Fish and Wildlife Service agents, federal scientists at the Conte Fish Lab in Turners Falls, and MA Fisheries & Wildlife officials have ignored this â€œdead reachâ€ where the riverâ€™s only breeding population of federally endangered shortnose sturgeon spawns; and migrating â€œfederal trustâ€ American shad and blueback herring are turned out of their ancient river highway two miles downstream.Â Â That power canal has hydro-turbines slicing through the current at three sites, and warming, silted-in habitats along its middle stretch.Â Few fish emerge from that habitat to swim to Vermont and New Hampshire.Â An ecosystem dies at Turners Falls.
Yet federal and state fisheries officials donâ€™t monitor the flows, releases and river levels coming down past the Turners Falls dam.Â They leave it to the complexâ€™s owners, global giant FirstLight, to police themselves on this critical reach.Â They then use what little data the company deigns to give them, often months lateâ€”about flow and numbers of migrating fish, in the fisheries science thatâ€™s been supposed to restore New Englandâ€™s migratory fish here these past last 40 years.Â Boy is that smart.
Last year, FirstLight surreptitiously dumped 65,000 tons of silt into the Connecticut here after it got clogged in its massive turbines–also fouling the entire, mile-long intake tunnel to its sprawling 5-billion gallon Northfield Mountain Pumped Storage Reservoir.Â They were mucking the sludge out of the reservoir for the first time in 20 years; thatâ€™s supposed to happen every five.Â On May 3rd FirstLight manager John Howard grossly under-represented the extent of the pollution to the US EPA when he notified them that â€œsilt was entering the river.â€Â Â From May 1 â€“ August 4th, FirstLight pushed at least 45,000 cubic square yards of muck into the Connecticut at Northfield.Â Daily, between 40 â€“ 50 dump truck loads flowed in.
On June 23, 2010, boater Bruce Miriam called the EPAâ€™s hotline reporting piles of silt in the river. Â Yet EPA didnâ€™t make its initial inspection until 3 weeks later, and it wasnâ€™t August 4th that EPA finally ordered them to cease and desist â€œpolluting the navigable waters of the United States.â€Â Fisheries agencies didnâ€™t pursue the critical matter of that oxygen-and-light-robbing silt.Â It was visible from Northfield to the mouth of the Deerfield River.Â Silt is known to affect the spawning, eggs and young of endangered sturgeon and federal-trust shadâ€”struggling here in the upper-most stretch that ocean-going migrants can reach in any meaningful numbers.
FirstLight was belatedly ordered to dredge up the mess theyâ€™d largely kept from the public by hiding it underwater–keeping the riverâ€™s levels at maximum height behind their TF dam gates for months.Â Ultimately they sucked out just a third of it, 15,000 cubic square yards.Â They were also ordered to come up with a future plan on how they would deal with the sludge clogging their reservoir.Â Last November, when EPA Council Michael Wagner was asked who will monitor FirstLightâ€™s actions in the future he replied, â€œMost compliance happens from the company.Â We just expect the company will comply.â€Â Â In another river-pollution non-sequitur, FirstLight quietly agreed to spend a few thousand dollars to fund a study of dragonfly larvae, far downstream from their pollution. Â That backroom deal was cut with MA Dept. of Environmental Protection, and agreed to by EPA.Â It was the publicâ€™s recompense.
Though the Connecticut belongs to the United States, Massachusetts, and all New Englanders, it appears its ownership and control has been ceded to FirstLightâ€”who could sell their hydro complex here tomorrow.Â Â The EPA, US F&WS, the US Geological Serviceâ€™s Conte Anadromous Fish Lab, the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission (CRASC), MA DEP and MA Div. of Fisheries & Wildlife–agencies charged with protecting this river system for all time, have offered up our river ecosystem to the short-term, profit desires of FirstLightâ€™s shareholders.
Whatâ€™s more, they are about to concede this riverâ€™s ecosystem disaster to the power company for all time–decades after they should have conducted the independent science and required that changes be instituted here that would have taken the river off life-support.Â That should have been in 1998–the halfway point in the current federal operating license.Â If they succeed, it will ensure the ecosystem remains comatose for generations.
In behind-the-scenes negotiations that should be subject to open-meeting laws and public input, federal and state fisheries officials are talking with FirstLight owners about permanently accepting the diversion of the bulk of the riverâ€™s flow and fish out of the riverbed–sending the mass of migratory fish into the trap they co-created with Northeast Utilities back in 1978: the treacherous currents and warming muck thatâ€™s the Turners Falls Power Canal.
An ample flow of natural seasonal current left in the river–leading fish directly upstream to a fish elevator at the dam would instantly revive the Connecticutâ€™s dead reach.Â Thatâ€™s what theyâ€™ve done downstream at Holyoke since 1955.Â Itâ€™s the East Coastâ€™s most successful fish passage.Â Between 40 â€“ 60% of the fish would quickly be able to pass Turners Falls, according to statements from US Conte Lab fish scientist Alex Haro at a 2010 fish passage symposium held at the US Fish & Wildlife Serviceâ€™s Region V Headquarters in early 2011.Â That passage would send meaningful numbers of American shad upstream toward VT and NH for the first time since John Adams was president.Â No honest fish scientist disputes this.
But instead, federal fish scientists including Haroâ€™s colleague at Conte, Ted Castro-Santos, are prioritizing building a fish lift at the foot of the Turners Falls Power Canalâ€”continuing to sentence embattled fish into a migratory limbo few emerge from. Â Â Both Haro and Castro-Santos are salaried federal employees, but up to half the money theyâ€™ve accepted for doing fish passage studies that center on keeping fish in the power canal comes from FirstLight.Â If federal and state fisheries officials sell-out the dead reach once more, it will be the fourth time in as many decades that watchdog agencies have failed our river here.
That power canal fish diversion was put in place by forerunners of these agents in 1978.Â Itâ€™s the Roach Motel of fish passage: millions of shad have checked in, but hardly a fish checks out the other side.Â A 1988 study conducted by John Oâ€™Leary of the Massachusetts Cooperative Fisheries Unit and supervised by Dr. Boyd Kynard, spelled out the failure of using that canal for fish passage.Â Successful passage that year came in at a whopping 5.4% at the Turners Falls Gatehouse–after years of tinkering with the hopeless system.Â The studyâ€™s summary sized-up the situation succinctly, â€œRemarks:Â â€œUpriver Passage: None.â€
But FirstLight makes electricity along this 5-mile reach in a deregulated market, and works to maximize profits for shareholders.Â Conversely, it sends pulses of water downstream from its giant Northfield generators through this industrial reach into critical spawning and migratory habitats while taking advantage of price spikes the energy â€œspot market.â€Â Â Ironically, the Northfield plant actually requires more energy to run than it produces.Â But when prices and demand climbs, they quickly spill punishing flows downstream at the dam; while at other times their hydro gates close and the river is left treacherously de-watered.Â Migrating shad and (formerly) blueback herring swim to this reach in numbers of at least 100,000 fish annually.Â But just a few get beyond Turners Falls dam, in place here since 1798.Â Whole seasons of just-spawned shortnose sturgeon eggs and young have been washed out of the riverbed by surges in this broken stretchâ€”where most migrating shad are conveniently shunted out of the river into miserable canal habitat.Â US F&WS and MA Fisheries & Wildlife leaders sit on their hands.
Caleb Slater, from MA Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Technical Committee Chair and fish passage subcommittee leader at the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission (CRASC) is one of those talking to FirstLight.Â With Massachusetts personnel negotiating on behalf of our interests, â€œopen meetings lawsâ€ should apply.Â But thereâ€™s no public input or access.Â Thereâ€™s been an unfilled MA â€œpublic sectorâ€ seat at the CRASC table since 2008.Â Itâ€™s a rubber stamp position anyway, really concerned with keeping money flowing for CRASCâ€™s massively-failed, half-billion-dollar salmon restoration and hatchery program.Â After 40 years, a few dozen hybrid salmon return.Â The other federal officials charged with representing our interests include John Warner of the US F&WS Field Office, Julie Crocker of NOAAâ€™s National Marine Fisheries Service, and NOAA attorney Kevin Collins. Â All are charged with protecting the ecosystem for our grandkids, not the power company of the day.
FirstLight only leases the use of some of our riverâ€™s waterâ€”subject to conditions in the current federal operating (FERC) license, in place until 2018.Â That license requires them to protect and improve passage for the migratory federal trust fish impacted by their facilities and operations.Â By law they must maintain conditions and construct new fish passage that protects the publicâ€™s migrating and spawning fishâ€”or they can be ordered to cease generating.
But the company has a powerful incentive to keep as many fish as possible out of the river–as it would be inconvenient to shareholders not to maximize profits by having to tailor flow regimes in the river at certain seasons to the needs of the ecosystemâ€™s fish.Â If this backroom deal gets made it offers FirstLight–or the power company-of-the-moment, carte blanch to continue profiting from free-wheeling, unmonitored operations on the dead reach–where FirstLight and its predecessors have been notably out of compliance with respect to pollution, flows, fish passage and federal trust species.Â Those activities go unchallenged.
Federal fisheries leaders and scientists at the nearby $12 million dollar Conte Anadramous Fish Lab, located on that canal, also have a powerful motive for wanting the fish to continue to be shunted into that debased canal habitat. Itâ€™s where their lab is and where they do their fish science, though the bulk of it involves studying baby, hatchery-produced, hybrid salmon.Â The results after 20 years of lab operations are abysmal: 100 returning adult salmon this yearâ€”in a program that has cost taxpayers hundreds of millions.Â The public wonâ€™t be willing to fund this white elephant forever.
Which sort-of leaves the federal Conte Lab scrambling for a reason to exist.Â Theyâ€™ve now even begun studying freshwater fish that are non-migratory–to fill the rather large hole in their failed collective purpose here.Â Just like FirstLight, it would be best to keep those formerly-ignored shad coming up into that canal and past their lab.Â They can then look like they are doing something.Â So, with renewed energy, they are once again conducting studies remarkably similar to ones done in past decades–to answer a question that seems more like a childrenâ€™s riddle at this point: Why canâ€™t fish taken out of their true riverbed habitats find their way through the labyrinth and roiling waters of a warming power canalâ€”and then jump up into flows from a higher pond at the dam to swim to Vermont and New Hampshire?Â Â Like the power company, thereâ€™s a money motive here to.Â Itâ€™s a co-dependency thatâ€™s developed over decades.
At a 2010 meeting of the Connecticut River Atlantic Salmon Commission, Vermont CRASC Tech Committee Member Jay McMenemy expressed surprise that four hybrid Atlantic salmonâ€”the seasonâ€™s entire free-swimming crop at Turners Falls, had reached the site by swimming directly up the dead reach of river, by-passing the power canal.Â With Northfield shut down, it shouldnâ€™t have surprised anyone.Â Iâ€™d first noted the looming disaster at Turners Falls in print a dozen years prior, and in 2007 had written a front-page story about the impacts of the Northfield plantâ€™s operations on dying shad passage in the Springfield Republican.Â Iâ€™d put shad and Northfield impacts on the cover of Massachusetts Audubonâ€™s Sanctuary Magazine again in 2009.
With FirstLight keeping river levels behind the dam as high as possible to cover their silt piles upstream, they tried to divert the rest of the riverâ€™s water into the canalâ€”their preferred route for struggling fish.Â But a canal is a finite conduit: it can only carry just so much water.Â It started raining really hard here in late-May; and flows from heavy late-spring rains kept coming downstream through June.Â That forced FirstLight to spill water over their dam–releasing substantial and steady flows to the riverâ€™s natural bed: the dead reach.Â Apparently even million-dollar, hatchery-hybrid salmon can tell a true river current from a by-pass trick.Â They followed their noses straight upstream to use the rarely-accessed fish ladder at the dam to pass Turners Falls.
So did the American shad.
When I enquired of FirstLightâ€™s Bob Stira about the already 600-800% increase in shad passing Turners Falls at a June 22, 2010 CRASC meetingâ€”trying to find out how many had been recorded swimming directly upstream to the dam and ladder at the top of that dead reach, he was hesitant, downplaying his answer, â€œOh, maybe three or four thousand.â€Â In fact, allowing that 4,000 American shad had likely passed upstream by this route alone was hugely significant: yearly averages had dropped to a paltry 2,000 â€“ 3,000 fish making it through the fish passage system at Turners Falls in the past decade.
Yet in 2010, with Northfield down–and FirstLightâ€™s releasing public fish tallies lagging weeks behind the daily figures available from Holyoke, 10,000 shad had already made it past Turners Falls dam.Â When I pointedly noted the relationship between the Northfield outage and record shad passage at Turners Falls, commissioners at the CRASC table had little in the way of response.Â Ultimately it was months before FirstLight released their final fish tallies for shad passage, which included numbers swimming up the dead reach, and ascending the ladder directly at the dam.Â In 2010, some 16,768 fish passed Turners Fallsâ€”the most fish recorded since 1995.
But even that number is highly suspect and likely low.Â FirstLightâ€™s fish counting equipment failed on 35 different occasionsâ€”with 17 of those failures occurring at the damâ€™s spillway ladder.Â Â Â Those cameras record the fish that swim up the riverbed when they have ample flow through their natural migration corridorâ€”that mostly-dead reach of river ecosystem.Â FirstLightâ€™s figures are the data Conte Lab and federal and state fisheries biologists use in their science.Â As I first noted about these instititutions to the Greenfield Recorderâ€™s Gary Sanderson last June, â€œDo you think theyâ€™re hiding something?â€
FirstLight and Conte researcher Ted Castro-Santos appeared anxious last year to attribute the huge increase in shad passage at Turners Falls to experiments theyâ€™d done changing the exit opening for shad in their preferred upstream fish passage routeâ€”the canal.Â But that new hole had first been cut three years prior, with the subsequent results admittedly â€œpoor.â€
To me it seemed obvious they were trying to steal the credit and credibility that belongs to nature: water in the actual riverbed, and a large population of American shad that has wanted to follow the river upstream to Vermont and New Hampshire for centuries now.
Managers and engineers at the Northfield-Turners Falls complex have been operating dam gates and manipulating flows along this five-mile stretch for decades.Â They operate their gates day and night.Â Federal and state fisheries managers and scientists donâ€™t monitor the impacts.Â Operating with few constraints, itâ€™s certainly possible to create conditions that move struggling fish in any direction you want them to go.Â For the fish, thatâ€™s usually a trip through the power canal.Â Rarely–when flows vary, it can be something elseâ€¦
Way back in the early 1980s hundreds of shad found enough current in the riverbed to follow it straight upstream to the dam.Â But operators wanted more water elsewhereâ€”to fill their mountaintop reservoir upstream, and the power canal flowing just east of the river.Â They closed the damâ€™s gates and shut off flow.Â Without flow and water left in the river to find a path downstream, hundreds of shad perished in the warming, oxygen-starved pools they got trapped in.Â Needless to say, that visible configuration was never seen again.
Today, both FirstLight and federal Conte Fish Lab scientist find themselves in a bit of a bind over the choked ecosystem and fish passage.Â Itâ€™s important to each to show that the best thing for those migratory fish is to be shoved out of the riverbed and into the power canal.Â They want to build a fish lift there first–at the foot of the canal, to keep that system in place.Â And itâ€™s todayâ€™s paltry flows coming downstream through the dead reach that allow this to happen.Â That status quo solution would keep everybody comfortably remunerated.
But with the anomaly of record numbers of shad passing Turners Falls while Northfield Mountain was down last year, you canâ€™t just return to business as usual.Â With those parching or punishing flows through the dead reach now a matter of public record–through recent news articles and OpEds, what you can do is try and optimize conditions that get a few more fish through that dismal system.Â This season there has been a dismally small, but consistent, current spilling downstream at Turners Falls dam, noted by the public.Â It seems mainly for show.
But downstream at Holyoke there has been a full 33% increase in American shad passage this year.Â Sadly for Mr. Castro-Santos and the canal-route proponents–the corresponding increase that should have followed at Turners Falls if their new exit strategy was indeed the savior of those migratory runs, has not occured.Â The numbers at Turners Falls were flat this yearâ€”actually down by a few hundred from last year.Â They are below the shad numbers passing Turners Falls dam a quarter century back, when John Oâ€™Learyâ€™s study characterized similar failing fish passage the â€œRemarksâ€ section of his 1988 study as: â€œUpriver Passage: None.â€
Sending fish into a power canal wonâ€™t fix the Connecticut Riverâ€™s broken ecosystemâ€”the ocean connection and its shad and herring runs that once swam north to Vermont and New Hampshire.Â Only real flows in the dead reach and a single fish lift directly upstream at the dam will make that possible.Â That needs to happen today–shouldâ€™ve happened a decade back.Â It remains a debt under requirements in the current license.
But that would require integrity, determination, leadershipâ€”even a bit of courage, something citizens have come to no longer expect from the people charged with protecting their river.Â And some of the folks making deals on the river today may be the same people in charge when a new federal licenseâ€”also ostensibly designed to improve the river ecosystem, comes up for retooling in 2018.Â Itâ€™s the recipe for a failed ecosystem for your great-grandchildren.
I recently spoke with the US F&WSâ€™s Ken Sprankle, the Connecticut River Coordinator and fish researcher who works from a Sunderland office.Â Ken seems to have some integrity.Â Heâ€™s trying to do some of the catch-up science that was left a decade in arrears at the federal Conte Lab.Â Last year he spent months cobbling together grant monies that enabled him to pay for a study that electronically tagged 100 American shad this year, to follow document their upstream migration patterns.Â He says heâ€™s getting lots of data.
But, when I questioned Ken about whether he is getting the critical independent data about flows, levels, and releases into the dead reach at Turners Falls damâ€”the ancient route for fish up the river, he said he is not.Â Heâ€™s asked FirstLightâ€™s Bob Stira for that information.Â Itâ€™s been promised, but he doesnâ€™t know when heâ€™ll get it.
This is virtually the only real independent data and science that matters.Â Itâ€™s the stuff that measures the damage to endangered shortnose sturgeon spawning populations and migrating federal trust fish that have always required a Connecticut River with water in it.Â I was disheartened to hear this.Â As other fisheries people tell me, however dedicated Ken might be, his work will only get as far as his US F&WS Region V supervisors allow him to go.
So, it appears the task of saving the Connecticut River ecosystem has been left up to New England citizens.Â You and me.Â Environmental groups have remained largely mute for decades.Â Most accept power company funding, and many have boards of directors littered with former power company managers.Â Though it would take just one with the courage to stand apart to perhaps change the course of this riverâ€™s history, I wouldnâ€™t bet on it.
But you can act.Â Contact your Congressmen and state representatives.Â Ask them about open meeting laws and to hold hearings on protecting the federal trust and the riverâ€™s ecosystem at Turners Falls.Â Ask them about the wisdom of spending $10 million a year on a failed salmon program that produces a few dozen fishâ€”while endangered sturgeon go unprotected and federal trust shad runs remain dead to Vermont and New Hampshire, stuck behind Turners Falls dam since 1798. Write a letter to the paper. And, whereâ€™s the independent environmental watchdog thatâ€™s publicly going to go to bat for the riverâ€™s dead reach? Â That might begin with you.
As research, take a ride to the Turners Falls dam and look south into the dead reach, then to the left at that churning canal.Â Then, beginning around September 10, 2011, go south in Turners Falls and cross the canal on the 11th Street Bridge.Â Head downstream along the public roads following the canal to where the paved road is called Migratory Way.Â Thatâ€™s where our federal fish lab is.Â You may have to walk; they sometimes close the gates to cars.
But, beginning September 12th, that canal is set to be dredged of its muck by FirstLight.Â Take a good look–before and after, at the muck-filled expanse.Â Then, decide for yourself whether this is a suitable place to send even a few of the futureâ€™s precious remaining fish.
Karl Meyer of Greenfield, MA writes on many topics as freelance journalist. He has written for national and regional publications and been featured on public radioâ€™s MarketPlace. Meyer is also an award-winning non-fiction childrenâ€™s author. He holds an MS in Environmental Science from Antioch New England University and writes often about Connecticut River issues. Read his blog at: www.karlmeyerwriting.com Â Contact him about writing and school and environmental presentations at: email@example.com .
Comments Off on IT’S THE DEAD REACH STUPID: the selling of the Connecticut River ecosystem